Comments on: Using SIOC ontology to connect Talk Digger with other online communities http://fgiasson.com/blog/index.php/2006/06/01/using_sioc_ontology_to_connect_talk_digg/ Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:27:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: rockyrackoon http://fgiasson.com/blog/index.php/2006/06/01/using_sioc_ontology_to_connect_talk_digg/comment-page-1/#comment-200056 rockyrackoon Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:49:25 +0000 #comment-200056 another thing: adding dcterms:created could be cool - add some time and date to the posts. changing dc:title with sioc: another thing:
adding dcterms:created could be cool – add some time and date to the posts.
changing dc:title with sioc:

]]> By: rockyrackoon http://fgiasson.com/blog/index.php/2006/06/01/using_sioc_ontology_to_connect_talk_digg/comment-page-1/#comment-200044 rockyrackoon Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:01:05 +0000 #comment-200044 hi please notice that "sioc:reply_to" is not the correct property! the correct property is "sioc:reply_of" with an F not a T. i know the wordpress exporter currently does the T mistake, but let's make sure the mistake doesn't spread. have a ball rocky hi
please notice that “sioc:reply_to” is not the correct property!
the correct property is “sioc:reply_of” with an F not a T.
i know the wordpress exporter currently does the T mistake, but let’s make sure the mistake doesn’t spread.

have a ball
rocky

]]> By: Fred http://fgiasson.com/blog/index.php/2006/06/01/using_sioc_ontology_to_connect_talk_digg/comment-page-1/#comment-529 Fred Fri, 09 Jun 2006 13:46:39 +0000 #comment-529 Hi John,<br /> <br /> Heheheh, I am thinking: how the hell my mind worked on that one? What probably happened is that I read the description of has_parent (the two last words are "child of") a then my mind stick with these two terms and I used child_of instead of has_parent. However I done this mistake only in that schemas and I just fixed it, so everything is fine by now.<br /> <br /> Thanks for reporting it!<br /> <br /> <br /> Salutations,<br /> <br /> <br /> Fred Hi John,

Heheheh, I am thinking: how the hell my mind worked on that one? What probably happened is that I read the description of has_parent (the two last words are “child of”) a then my mind stick with these two terms and I used child_of instead of has_parent. However I done this mistake only in that schemas and I just fixed it, so everything is fine by now.

Thanks for reporting it!

Salutations,

Fred

]]> By: Cloud http://fgiasson.com/blog/index.php/2006/06/01/using_sioc_ontology_to_connect_talk_digg/comment-page-1/#comment-528 Cloud Fri, 09 Jun 2006 11:10:00 +0000 #comment-528 Wow - a really cool application of the SIOC ontology...<br /> <br /> That circular reference thing with Forums may be unique to TalkDigger, but I see what you're getting at... We haven't introduced a child_of yet anyway, we just used has_parent for the inverse... Wow – a really cool application of the SIOC ontology…

That circular reference thing with Forums may be unique to TalkDigger, but I see what you’re getting at… We haven’t introduced a child_of yet anyway, we just used has_parent for the inverse…

]]>