Comments on: Revision 1.03 of the Music Ontology http://fgiasson.com/blog/index.php/2007/02/12/revision_1_03_of_the_music_ontology/ Tue, 06 Jul 2010 06:54:51 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Fred http://fgiasson.com/blog/index.php/2007/02/12/revision_1_03_of_the_music_ontology/comment-page-1/#comment-657 Fred Wed, 14 Feb 2007 22:09:18 +0000 #comment-657 Hi Alexander,<br /> <br /> <br /> Yeah possibly. I used the has_xxxx syntax has SIOC. but we should reconcider it with the new updates me and Yves are currently doing to the ontology.<br /> <br /> <br /> Thanks!<br /> <br /> <br /> Salutations,<br /> <br /> <br /> Fred Hi Alexander,

Yeah possibly. I used the has_xxxx syntax has SIOC. but we should reconcider it with the new updates me and Yves are currently doing to the ontology.

Thanks!

Salutations,

Fred

]]> By: Alexander http://fgiasson.com/blog/index.php/2007/02/12/revision_1_03_of_the_music_ontology/comment-page-1/#comment-656 Alexander Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:13:59 +0000 #comment-656 Wouldn't "mo:hasMovement" be better than "mo:has_movement"?<br /> Wouldn’t “mo:hasMovement” be better than “mo:has_movement”?

]]>